Home / Comparisons
BCF FUNDING

Fixed ACH vs Percentage-of-Sales MCA

Fixed ACH vs Percentage-of-Sales MCA: compare structure, speed, qualification, cost, payments and best-fit business use cases.

Core difference: Fixed ACH uses scheduled withdrawals; percentage-of-sales structures remit based on actual receivables or processing volume.

How to compare them

QuestionMCAAlternative
StructureGenerally purchase of future receivablesDepends on the alternative
Qualification focusOften revenue and bank activityMay emphasize credit, collateral or invoices
PaymentOften daily/weekly or percentage-basedVaries
SpeedCan be fastVaries widely
CostCan be higher than bank financingVaries by product and risk

Practical tradeoff

A variable structure may move with sales, while fixed withdrawals can be easier to forecast but may require reconciliation if revenue changes.

Questions to ask

  • How much cash do I actually receive?
  • What are the total dollars I am obligated to pay or remit?
  • How often does the payment leave the account?
  • How quickly does the business investment generate cash?
  • What happens if revenue is lower than expected?

Do not compare only the headline rate

Commercial financing structures use different pricing conventions. Compare net proceeds, total cost, timing, fees, collateral or UCC implications, flexibility and the business return generated by the capital.

Ready to explore an MCA?

Start the mobile application or contact BCF Funding directly.

Start Application
Apply NowCall